• nj.com
    Published: Sunday, May 13, 2012, 7:44 AM

    By Karin Price Mueller/The Star-LedgerThe Star-Ledger

    At age 63, Carol is planning for a very active retirement. She hopes to sell her home and move to what she calls a more retirement-friendly state. October is her self-imposed deadline.

    “I will be traveling, wining and dining extensively for the next five years, and for the succeeding five years, less. And less with each succeeding five-year intervals,” she said.

    Carol, whose name has been changed, has saved more than $1.15 million in 401(k) plans, $57,700 in IRAs. $18,500 in a brokerage account, $141,400 in money markets and $18,000 in checking. She also plans to take Social Security before her full retirement age, and she expects benefits of $1,787 a month.

    The Star-Ledger asked Jerry Lynch, a certified financial planner with JFL Consulting in Fairfield, to help Carol determine if she can afford the retirement she wants.

    “She is healthy, has been consistently saving for many years, she makes a good living and has been living below her means, which is great,” Lynch says. “She now wants to see if she can retire in style at an income of around $100,000 after taxes annually.”

    Lynch says a large concern for any financial plan is outliving your money. He says he will look at a family’s history to determine how long someone might live.

    “What scares me is that while Carol’s parents lived into their mid-80s, her grandmother lived to be 102,” he says. “If she only lives as long as her grandmother, that would be being retired for almost 40 years while going through a variety of different market cycles. This makes it very difficult to plan.”

    Lynch ran through a couple of different possibilities to give Carol a predictable stream of income in retirement so she doesn’t have to worry about running out of money.

    Social Security is one area. She can take a monthly benefit of $1,787 if she starts soon, but by waiting longer, Lynch says her benefit would be increased by 8 percent a year. If she waits until age 70, her benefit would be about 50 percent higher than the benefit she would receive at her normal full retirement age, he said. (Waiting is always beneficial — compared to what she could have received at age 62, the benefit at age 70 would have been 80 percent higher, Lynch said.)

    “For someone with a long life expectancy, this is really something to consider,” Lynch says.

    Next Lynch considered annuities.

    “In spite of all the criticisms that I have heard on these products, there is something to be said about having guarantees on some — not all — of your funds in retirement,” he says.

    Annuities can give you guaranteed returns and guaranteed income for life, he says, and you can also choose for the annuity invested more aggressively because the insurer is assuming the risk, which would allow an investor to be more conservative with other funds.

    There’s also the possibility of a reverse mortgage. Lynch says these are very misunderstood products, and in Carol’s case, she could take a reverse mortgage as soon as she moves — she’s planning to pay cash for her new home. This means she could use the tax-free income from a reverse mortgage to defer her Social Security benefits to age 70.

    Carol says she wants $100,000 of income, after taxes, in retirement. Lynch says that means about $120,000 before taxes. Assuming that she sells her primary home and uses the proceeds for her new place, she’d have about $1.25 million in funds to draw from. But Lynch has concerns.

    Assuming that she takes Social Security at age 64, this gives her $21,444 annually. She’d need another $100,000 a year to get her the target income.

    If she waits until age 70, she’d have more than $30,000 coming in from Social Security, so her investments would need to provide $90,000 a year.

    “Generally the draw-down rate I would suggest is around 4 percent, which would give us around $50,000 per year,” he says. “I cannot reasonably get the income close to where her target is.”

    Lynch says working a few more years may not be appealing to Carol, but it’s a better option than trying to find a job when she’s in her late 70s or early 80s and finds she’s short on cash.

    Lynch also took a look at Carol’s tax situation. She’s in the 28 percent federal tax bracket and pays New Jersey taxes on top of that. He says her investments are unnecessarily adding to her tax bill. For example, she received $6,400 in taxable interest last year, which cost her over $2,000 in taxes. He recommends she consider New Jersey short-duration municipal bonds that should pay similar interest, but would be free of both federal and state tax.

    So what does it all mean?

    Lynch says Carol should lower her expectations for income in retirement. Her goal of $100,000 after taxes is not realistic, but $70,000 to $80,000 is.

    She should consider pushing back her retirement date. This would allow her Social Security to grow, and she could continue saving to her retirement accounts. He says her retirement accounts could grow to nearly $1.6 million at age 70, which would translate to a 4 percent drawdown rate of $63,000.

    Another option is semi-retirement and working part time. But this income would have to be enough to sustain her without dipping into investments or starting Social Security benefits.

    Carol also needs to be cognizant that she could need long-term care someday, and she’d have to foot the bill.

    “With a grandmother that lived to 102 … if she lives that long at some point she will need care,” he said. “A long-term care situation can blow up an otherwise solid financial plan.”

    Get With the Plan is designed to illuminate personal-finance concepts and isn’t a substitute for actual financial planning or dedicated professional advice. To participate, contact Karin Price Mueller at kmueller@starledger.com.

    Jerry Lynch is a representative of Comprehensive Capital Management, Inc., an SEC registered investment adviser through which such representative provides investment advisory services, with principal offices at 2001 Route 46, Suite 506, Parsippany, NJ 07054 (Phone 800-637-3211).  Jerry Lynch may also provide commission based securities sales through Comprehensive Asset Management and Servicing, Inc., an SEC registered and FINRA member broker-dealer, with principal offices also located at 2001 Route 46, Suite 506, Parsippany, NJ 07054 (Phone 800-637-3211).  JFL Consulting is a trade name, it is not a registered investment adviser. All questions should be directed to Ron Rollins, Chief Compliance Officer.

     

  • nj.com

    Published: Sunday, May 06, 2012, 7:00 AM

    By Karin Price Mueller/The Star-Ledger

    Q. I’ve been receiving a lot of emails lately regarding the 3.8 percent real estate tax that is included in “ObamaCare.” I believe there is misinformation being circulated to scare people, especially senior citizens. Please provide details on this tax and how it will affect the sellers of homes.
    – BB

    A. We’re really glad you asked this question. Scare tactics is right, so let’s set the record straight.

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called ObamaCare in some circles, is somewhat in flux as the rules and regulations are only now starting to be implemented.  The 3.8 percent surtax on the sale of homes will only impact higher income taxpayers starting in 2013.

    Those potentially affected are married couples with income of $250,000 or more with a home sale of more than $500,000, or individuals with income of $200,000 or more and a home sale of more than $250,000.

    “If you are married, you can have a gain up to $500,000, or a gain of $250,000 if single, on a primary residence where you pay no income taxes,” said Jerry Lynch, a certified financial planner with JFL Consulting in Fairfield. “Only the gain above that level would be subject to capital gains tax.”

    Lynch said if it was an investment property, there would be a capital gains tax on the increase in property value.

    For those who would be subject to either capital gains tax, only those with the higher incomes would have to pay the tax.

    To see how the 3.8 percent surtax would be applied to a home sale in 2013, William Stratton, a certified financial planner with Nova Financial Consulting in Manasquan, offered this example.

    Assume a married couple has an income of $300,000 and they sell their home for $700,000. Because current tax law exempts the first $500,000 of capital gains on the sale, the 3.8 percent surtax applies to the capital gain in excess of the $500,000 exemption, or $200,000. However in 2013, another tax law change increases the current 15 percent capital gain tax to 20 percent, Stratton said.

    “This results in a total capital gain tax of 23.8 percent on the $200,000 gain for the home sale, or $47,600,” Stratton said. “If the couple’s income was less than $250,000, their capital gain tax would be 20 percent, or $40,000.”

    So you can see that the 3.8 percent surtax on home sales will not affect very many people.

    Also note, Lynch said, that when there is a death of a property owner, there is a step up in basis, which means that the cost basis would be on the date of the owner’s death, so your heirs wouldn’t have to pay much if any if they sold the home soon after.

    Whether or not the surtax actually happens is in limbo, Stratton said. Some states have challenged the health law in the courts, and a challenge is currently being decided by the Supreme Court, which held three days of oral arguments in March. The decision is expected to come down in June.

    “No one knows what the court will decide,” Stratton said. “We’ll just have to wait for the court decision to see how ObamaCare and taxes will be affected.”
    —Karin Price Mueller

    E-mail your questions to askbiz@starledger.com.

    © 2012 NJ.com. All rights reserved.

    Jerry Lynch is a representative of Comprehensive Capital Management, Inc., an SEC registered investment adviser through which such representative provides investment advisory services, with principal offices at 2001 Route 46, Suite 506, Parsippany, NJ 07054 (Phone 800-637-3211). Jerry Lynch may also provide commission based securities sales through Comprehensive Asset Management and Servicing, Inc., an SEC registered and FINRA member broker-dealer, with principal offices also located at 2001 Route 46, Suite 506, Parsippany, NJ 07054 (Phone 800-637-3211). JFL Consulting is a trade name, it is not a registered investment adviser. All questions should be directed to Ron Rollins, Chief Compliance Officer.

  • cnbc-logo

    By Daniel Bukszpan

    Posted 01 May 2012

    Jerry Lynch of JFL Total Wealth Management has been featured in the CNBC Article “American Tax Havens” on their central site. Please visit the following link to receive timely data on taxes across various state lines: http://www.cnbc.com/id/47247578?slide=11. Slide 11 of 12 features commentary by Jerry Lynch.

    Should you have any questions, please contact our office at (973) 439-1190.

    Jerry Lynch is a representative of Comprehensive Capital Management, Inc., an SEC registered investment adviser through which such representative provides investment advisory services, with principal offices at 2001 Route 46, Suite 506, Parsippany, NJ 07054 (Phone 800-637-3211).  Jerry Lynch may also provide commission based securities sales through Comprehensive Asset Management and Servicing, Inc., an SEC registered and FINRA member broker-dealer, with principal offices also located at 2001 Route 46, Suite 506, Parsippany, NJ 07054 (Phone 800-637-3211).  JFL Consulting is a trade name, it is not a registered investment adviser. All questions should be directed to Ron Rollins, Chief Compliance Officer.

     

   

Recent Comments

  • Is the conference for Saturday, November 3rd, still happenin...
  • Publication 555 page 8 addresses the death of a spouse in a ...
  • I'd really be interested to know your authority for the stat...
  • Thank you for this very useful information.